Click Here To Visit Our Sponsor
Baseball America Online - Teams

Pirates Chat

Page not found |

Unfortunately, the page you’ve requested cannot be displayed. It appears that you’ve lost your way, either through an outdated link or a typo on the page you were trying to reach. Head back to the homepage or try searching the site below.

Pirates Top 10 Prospects

By John Perrotto
February 14, 2003

Want More?

Prospect Handbook
Does 10 prospects per team only whet your appetite? How does 30 sound? If you want the more of in-depth information you're finding here on three times as many players, Baseball America's 2003 Prospect Handbook is for you.

The Pirates have become synonymous with losing over the past decade.

Since winning three straight division titles from 1990-92, Pittsburgh has suffered through 10 straight losing seasons, the longest stretch of futility in the franchise’s 116-year history. However, their long history of losing in the minors came to an abrupt end last season.

General manager Dave Littlefield hired Brian Graham as farm director prior to last season, telling him to change the mindset in the system. Graham, a former minor league manager for the Indians and a big league coach for Baltimore and Cleveland, did just that.

The Pirates broke an incredible string in which their farm clubs had combined to have losing seasons in 32 of the previous 33 years. Pittsburgh affiliates didn’t just win. They won big. The six clubs went a combined 399-300 (.571), the second-best mark in baseball behind Cleveland’s .577. The Pirates were also one of just two organizations, along with the Dodgers, to have each of their six affiliates finish with winning records. Four of Pittsburgh’s farm clubs went to the playoffs, and both of its full-season Class A teams won league championships.

"We are proud of the year we had," Littlefield said, "and feel this will help in laying the foundation for the future."

The Pirates made more of an effort to win by keeping most of their players as the same level throughout the season. That was a marked contrast to previous regimes that seemingly shuffled minor league rosters on a daily basis.

"It’s easier to develop players on a winning team," Graham said. "Winning also builds confidence, regardless of what level of baseball you’re on. It creates a better atmosphere and I firmly believe you learn better habits when you’re winning, and those carry with a player from the minor leagues to the major leagues."

While the farm system has improved since Littlefield took over for Cam Bonifay in June 2001, the pipeline providing players to the major league club has yet to be built. The Pirates stocked their Triple-A Nashville farm club primarily with veteran free agents last season. Neither the Sounds nor Double-A Altoona had any players ranked among their league’s top 20 prospects.

The Pirates have assembled talent at Class A and below after three good drafts by former scouting director Mickey White from 1999-2001 and a solid one by Ed Creech, his replacement, last year.

Top Prospects
Of The Past Decade

1993 Kevin Young, 1b
1994 Midre Cummings, of
1995 Trey Beamon, of
1996 Jason Kendall, c
1997 Kris Benson, rhp
1998 Kris Benson, rhp
1999 Chad Hermansen, of
2000 Chad Hermansen, of
2001 J.R. House
2002 J.R. House

Prospect Archives

1999 Top 10 Prospects
2000 Top 10 Prospects
2001 Top 10 Prospects
2002 Top 10 Prospects
• Top 10 Prospects Since 1983
• Top Prospects for all 30 teams
1. John VanBenchoten, rhp

Age: 22. B-T: R-R. Ht.: 6-4. Wt.: 210. Drafted: Kent State, 2001 (1st round). Signed by: Duane Gustavson.

Background: When VanBenschoten led NCAA Division I with 31 home runs as a junior at Kent State in 2001, most clubs projected him as a power-hitting right fielder in their draft preparations. The Pirates watched VanBenschoten serve as the Golden Flashes’ closer, however, and were intrigued enough by his mound work to surprise many by drafting him as a pitcher. VanBenschoten split time between pitcher and DH at short-season Williamsport in 2001 but stayed strictly on the mound last season and ranked as the No. 2 prospect in the low Class A South Atlantic League. He anchored the rotation as Hickory won the league championship.

Strengths: VanBenschoten has a power arm that wasn’t overworked in college. His fastball reaches the mid-90s with good movement and sits comfortably at 93 mph. At the behest of the Pirates, VanBenschoten began throwing his curveball more last year and it became a plus pitch by the end of the season. He also has a slider with hard, late movement. Pittsburgh has made sure not to overextend VanBenschoten but believes he’ll develop into a workhorse by the time he gets to the majors. While he won’t get a chance to swing a bat again until he reaches Double-A, VanBenschoten’s power stroke figures to make him one of the game’s better-hitting pitchers. He’s intelligent and takes instruction well. One Pirates executive calls VanBenschoten "the total package, everything you would want in a pitching prospect."

Weaknesses: VanBenschoten was an NCAA Division I prospect as a pitcher in high school but hasn’t faced many advanced hitters. He tends to give up too many hits for a pitcher with his stuff, though the Pirates feel that will change as he gains more experience. Like most young pitchers, his changeup is erratic. He needs to refine it to have something to keep hitters off balance.

The Future: Pittsburgh will promote VanBenschoten to high Class A Lynchburg this season. While the Pirates have been criticized in some circles for not pushing him, they’re mindful of his lack of experience. He has the talent to be a No. 1 starter in the majors and eventually could skip a level and arrive in Pittsburgh by 2005.

2002 Club (Class)














Hickory (A)














Click here for prospects 2-10.

Page not found |

Unfortunately, the page you’ve requested cannot be displayed. It appears that you’ve lost your way, either through an outdated link or a typo on the page you were trying to reach. Head back to the homepage or try searching the site below.