<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Baseball America</title>
		<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/</link>
		<description>The Home For Baseball Insiders</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:49:23 EST</pubDate>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		<ttl>1</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>Prospects/Draft Chat With Jim Callis</title>
			<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/chat/2013/2614890.html</link>
			<description>
								Content: 






Doug (Las Vegas): I noticed on Keith Law&#39;s 
recent list that a kid named Matt Krook popped up as the number 17 
prospect in the country. I haven&#39;t heard his name and the list did not 
say a whole lot about him.  Is he really a first round type of guy and 
can you please tell us more?  Thanks!






Jim Callis: Hi, everyone. Glad to be back for the 
regular Wednesday chats after a winter hiatus as we did our series of 
Top 10 Prospects chats ... Matt Krook&#39;s stock is shooting through the 
roof. He&#39;s a high school lefthander from California who looks like a 
definite first-rounder, could be the first prep arm taken. Consistent 
low-90s fastball, spins a tight curveball. I believe Conor Glassey will 
have more on Krook in his next edition of Draft Tracker.









Diego Maradona (1986): Do you think Byron Buxton will hit above .250 in his full season debut?






Jim Callis: Yes, not that it really matters either way.









Justin (Tucson, AZ): I&#39;m hearing great things 
about Carlos Sanchez with the White Sox. Comparisons to Jeter, Alomar 
and Ventura have been written but I don&#39;t see him in Baseballamerica&#39;s 
top 100 prospects list. He . . .
				
				
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:30:56 EST</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/chat/2013/2614890.html</guid>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>2013 San Francisco Giants Top 10 Prospects Chat With Andy Baggarly</title>
			<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/prospects/chat/2013/2614595.html</link>
			<description>
								Content: Andy Baggarly: Hi everyone, thanks for joining the 
annual Giants top-10 prospects chat. Apologies for getting started a 
little later than originally scheduled. I see lots of good questions 
from the usual suspects but I&#39;ll try to bounce around the board during 
the next hour or so. In other words, there&#39;s still time to submit a 
question and I&#39;ll do my best to answer everything I can. First question 
coming up in a moment...






@Jaypers413 (IL): Thanks for the chat. I see 
you rated Shilo McCall as the biggest sleeper in the system. How fast 
could he rise this year, and what does he project as?




Andy Baggarly: McCall was the outlier of the 2012 draft
 &amp;mdash; the only high schooler among their top 26 picks. He was committed to
 Arkansas but scouts had a good feel for his signability and liked his 
blend of tools. I don&#39;t think he&#39;ll move quickly given his age, but he&#39;s
 got a lot of upside. Plus he&#39;s from New Mexico, home state of Cody 
Ross, and that never hurts!






Ben (Leland Grove): Is Blackburn&#39;s arsenal of 
pitches considered to be inconsistent with the numbers he put up last 
season? In other words, is . . .
				
				
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:41:06 EST</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/prospects/chat/2013/2614595.html</guid>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Top 100 College Prospects Chat</title>
			<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/college/chat/2012/2614397.html</link>
			<description>
								Content: Moderator: Aaron Fitt will answer your questions about college prospects for the 2013 draft beginning at 4 p.m. ET.


Aaron Fitt: Hello folks, sorry I&#39;m a few minutes late getting started &amp;mdash; had to take a phone call from a coach. Let&#39;s get going!



Mick (Chicago): You have to scroll down to 54 to find a shortstop, and it&#39;s Brandon Trinkwon...wow!?!


Aaron Fitt: Great observation, Mick &amp;mdash; that is the 
biggest reason scouts are not terribly excited about this draft class: 
there is a real lack of impact up-the-middle guys. Most of the top 
college shortstops are more in the steady grinder mold (think Matt 
Reida, Jack Reinheimer at ECU, Adam Frazier, Kyle Farmer at Georgia, 
etc). That&#39;s why a guy like Hunter Dozier is interesting &amp;mdash; he&#39;s got 
real impact tools, and has a chance to shoot up this list in the fall. 
Scouts really liked what they saw from Trinkwon in the Cape &amp;mdash; he&#39;s got 
an innate feel to hit that stands out in this group of shortstops, and 
he&#39;s a good athlete. Good all-around player.



Not Jaypers (Wisconsin): Aaron, who are you seing as some of the biggest risers on this list? Also, who seems to . . .
				
				
			</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:08:37 EST</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/college/chat/2012/2614397.html</guid>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Draft Chat With Conor Glassey</title>
			<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/chat/2012/2614315.html</link>
			<description>
								Content: Conor Glassey: Hey everybody! Thanks for coming out. 
It&#39;s never too early to talk about the draft, as far as I am concerned. 
This is always a fun time of year here at Baseball America. While 
today&#39;s content focused on the high school side of the coin, feel free 
to ask about anything draft-related. I&#39;ll chat here for about an hour 
before I have to get back to writing up the Mariners chapter for our 
Prospect Handbook.



Mick (Chicago): Are there any position prospects, beside Corey Ray to see in Illinois next spring?


Conor Glassey: Mick - Corey Ray was a tough cut from 
the list. He was on some initial versions of it, but scouts feel that 
he&#39;s a bit of a tweener right now. He has a nice swing, but it&#39;s more of
 a flat, line-drive swing and not one built for power. So he doesn&#39;t 
have profile power for a corner outfield spot and doesn&#39;t cover enough 
ground to play center field in the big leagues. Ray&#39;s teammate Ro 
Coleman is a really fun little spark plug committed to Vanderbilt, but 
he&#39;s another guy who would be better served going to college. Chuckie 
Robinson from Danville has . . .
				
				
			</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:20:40 EST</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/chat/2012/2614315.html</guid>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Jim Callis Chat: Sept. 19</title>
			<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2614074.html</link>
			<description>
								Content: 
@Jaypers413 (IL): Hey, Jim. Your first 
impression of Bundy&#39;s callup? Think we could be seeing another instance 
of David Price if they make it to the postseason?


Jim Callis: I would have called him up earlier. You 
don&#39;t have to blow him out, but he arguably has a better arm than anyone
 on their staff and he can be an asset as they try to fight their way 
into the playoffs. I understand trying to keep pitchers healthy, but 
there&#39;s no sure way to health and I can&#39;t fathom why the Nationals and 
Orioles aren&#39;t using everything they have. Kudos to the Orioles for 
turning to Bundy, even if they needed an 18-inning game to make them see
 the light.



Ben (Leland Grove): Now that Simmons has graduated, who gets your vote for Atlanta&#39;s top position prospect in their farm system?


Jim Callis: They don&#39;t have anyone who&#39;s Top 
100-worthy. I want to say Christian Bethancourt, but he had a sub-.600 
OPS this year, so give me Edward Salcedo.



Andrew (Baltimore): It was my understanding the
 O&#39;s didn&#39;t consider Bundy ready for the bigs and sent him to instructs.
 Is this move merely a matter of needing an extra body . . .
				
				
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:18:03 EST</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2614074.html</guid>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Prospects Chat With Jim Callis</title>
			<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2614030.html</link>
			<description>
								Content: 
jim m (mariette, ga): What is the offensive upside for francisco lindor ?
thanks !


Jim Callis: Hi, everyone. Glad to be here for the 
weekly Wednesday chat. Just to mix things up this week, let&#39;s see if I 
can hit one question for every organization . . . As for Lindor, I was 
very impressed with how well he controlled the strike zone as an 
18-year-old in the Midwest League. I could see him his upside as a .300 
hitter with 10-15 homers per year. He&#39;s a gifted defender who also will 
produce at the plate.



Ben (Leland Grove): With the recent injury to 
Jason Hammel, could you see the O&#39;s giving Bundy a shot, if only in a 
bullpen capacity, or are they set at holding him off?


Jim Callis: I think they&#39;re set on holding him off, but
 who knows when they&#39;ll contend again? He&#39;s already on the 40-man 
roster, and I&#39;d take whatever innings he can give.



Mike (Tampa): Even though it doesn&#39;t count, I&#39;m curious what you think about Guerrieri suddenly issuing walks in his past two playoff starts?


Jim Callis: Wouldn&#39;t read too much into two starts at 
the end of the season. I . . .
				
				
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:15:53 EST</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2614030.html</guid>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Prospects Chat With Jim Callis</title>
			<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2614013.html</link>
			<description>
								Content: 

Evan (Chicago): Is Marcus Littlewood a prospect or suspect at this point?




Jim Callis: Still a prospect. He converted to catcher 
this year and so far, so good. He&#39;ll factor into our Northwest League 
Top 20 Prospects list when that comes out later this month. He&#39;s still 
just 20 and had a nice year at the plate considering his age and league.






Tommy (New York): Jim...In regards to the top 
30 Cape Cod Prospects, I was wondering what scouts thought of Daniel 
Palka of Georgia Tech/Wareham this summer. Thanks.




Jim Callis: They liked Palka, who was one of the best 
power hitters in the league. There just wasn&#39;t enough room for him on 
the Top 30, though he would have factored into the 31-40 range if I had 
gone that deep. He has a big swing but was less pull-happy than he was 
last year on the Cape.






Bill F. (Scottsdale, AZ): True or False: 5 years down the road either Tim Beckham or Hak-Ju Lee will be the Tampa Bay Rays starting SS?




Jim Callis: True. I still believe in Lee. I don&#39;t think
 Beckham has any chance to be a big league starting shortstop. He just 
doesn&#39;t cover . . .
				
				
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:42:40 EST</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2614013.html</guid>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Jim Callis Chat: Aug. 29</title>
			<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2613983.html</link>
			<description>
								Content: 
Ronald (Toronto): Talk me off the ledge, Jim: Should I still be as excited about the Jays farm system as I was a year ago?


Jim Callis: Yes. Some players have regressed, sure, but
 they do that in every system. Focus on the Lansing rotation (Sanchez, 
Syndergaard, Nicolino) and their banner 2012 draft.



Jim (Philly): Would you consider Darin Ruf to be a top 30 prospect in their system? Top 20?


Jim Callis: Top 30 yes, Top 20 maybe. The Phillies 
system isn&#39;t nearly as deep as it used to be. He&#39;s 25, which is old for 
Double-A, but he has hit 37 homers and controls the strike zone, so 
he&#39;ll find a spot in the Prospect Handbook.



Matt V (Philly): With Tyler Cloyd getting the 
call for his MLB debut tonight with the Phillies, what can we Fightin&#39;s 
fans expect both short and long term?


Jim Callis: He&#39;s a finesse righthander who&#39;s not a viable long-term option for the rotation. Great year in the minors (15-1, 2.26).



@Jaypers413 (IL): Your thoughts on the increasing number of positive drug testing results of late, the latest of which being Sale and Stroman?


Jim Callis: Not in regards to those two players . . .
				
				
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:32:30 EST</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2613983.html</guid>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Prospects Chat With Jim Callis</title>
			<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2613984.html</link>
			<description>
								Content: 
Ronald (Toronto): Talk me off the ledge, Jim: Should I still be as excited about the Jays farm system as I was a year ago?



Jim Callis: Yes. Some players have regressed, sure, but
 they do that in every system. Focus on the Lansing rotation (Sanchez, 
Syndergaard, Nicolino) and their banner 2012 draft.






Jim (Philly): Would you consider Darin Ruf to be a top 30 prospect in their system? Top 20?



Jim Callis: Top 30 yes, Top 20 maybe. The Phillies 
system isn&#39;t nearly as deep as it used to be. He&#39;s 25, which is old for 
Double-A, but he has hit 37 homers and controls the strike zone, so 
he&#39;ll find a spot in the Prospect Handbook.






Matt V (Philly): With Tyler Cloyd getting the 
call for his MLB debut tonight with the Phillies, what can we Fightin&#39;s 
fans expect both short and long term?



Jim Callis: He&#39;s a finesse righthander who&#39;s not a viable long-term option for the rotation. Great year in the minors (15-1, 2.26).






@Jaypers413 (IL): Your thoughts on the increasing number of positive drug testing results of late, the latest of which being Sale and Stroman?



Jim Callis: Not in regards to those two players . . .
				
				
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:48:35 EST</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2613984.html</guid>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Prospects Chat With Jim Callis</title>
			<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2613947.html</link>
			<description>
								Content: Jim Callis: Hi, everyone. Glad to be back in the chat room. Let&#39;s get to it.



Kevin (Point Mugu): Jim,

Is Clayton Blackburn for real?  What are your thoughts on him?


Jim Callis: He&#39;s legit. He went late in the 2011 draft 
(16th round) because most clubs thought he was destined to attend 
Oklahoma. Good arm, good feel, plus fastball with average secondary 
pitches.



@Jaypers413 (IL): Assuming he gets the call to 
Cincy next month, could you envision Dusty giving Hamilton any chances 
to hit, or would he be used strictly as a PR?


Jim Callis: Might get an AB or two, but I think he&#39;d be
 mostly a pinch-runner. Don&#39;t think he&#39;s ready to do much damage against
 big league pitching.



Sean (Coatesville, PA): Brian Goodwin has had a bit of a slow transition to AA, does he still project as a future CF/Leadoff hitter? ETA 2014?


Jim Callis: I didn&#39;t think he&#39;d get to or be ready for 
Double-A this season, so the performance doesn&#39;t bother me. Projection 
and ceiling remain the same, 2014 ETA makes sense.



Brooks (Maryland): Jim-Only 39 games left, are O&#39;s going to collapse like Pythagorous says they should?


Jim Callis: I still think . . .
				
				
			</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:37:13 EST</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/chat/2012/2613947.html</guid>
		</item>
		
		
	</channel>
</rss>
