Jim Callis and Aaron Fitt chatted on June 12
With the draft wrapped up and the College
World Series getting ready to start, we have a combo-chat today. Aaron
Fitt will chat about the College World Series beginning at 1 p.m. ET,
while Jim Callis will answer draft questions beginning at 2 p.m. ET.
Ask your questions for either now.
Rob Studer (St. Joseph, MO): I went to the CWS
last year and got to see a 'game changer' in Gordon Beckham. Who are
three players in this years' field that I should watch for as 'big
stage' players? Thanks
Hi everyone, let's get going and see how
much ground we can cover before the State of Baseball press conference
starts up here at Rosenblatt Stadium. Rob, for my money, the most
exciting player in this field is Virginia sophomore center fielder
Jarrett Parker. This guy's a true five-tool talent, and he's constantly
making things happen, either with his bat, his legs or his glove. Jason
Kipnis is a similar player who makes a similar impact at the college
level, though I don't think he can quite match Parker's star potential
at the big league level. And, of course, you'll get to watch the best
hitter in college baseball—North Carolina's Dustin Ackley. That guy is
a game-changer, without question.
Phil (Chandler, AZ): Mike Leake was discussed
as throwing a lot of innings in college - as if that is a negative.
While he did have two games of high (probably too high) pitch counts,
for the most part, Leake is a very efficient pitcher with lower pitch
counts. Wouldn't scouts rather look at pitch counts and pitches thrown
rather than innings pitched?
It's an important distinction, Phil, and I
think if scouts thought he was drastically overworked, there's no way
he would have gone eighth overall. A greater concern: If the Sun Devils
make a deep run in Omaha, I have a strong feeling Leake will be coming
back on short rest, whether in relief or a starting role. But ASU's
coaches realize what's at stake for Leake, and I imagine they'll be
careful not to push him too much.
Nate (College Park): Why did the braves pick
Mike Minor? He seems like a limited upside guy that will move quickly
through the minors and the braves are one of a handful of teams that
don't need any immediate starting pitching help.
Nate, I wondered about that myself. For an
organization that has gone to the high-upside high schoolers well more
than any other, I thought that was peculiar move; it's not like they
took a chance on a potential star from the college ranks like Grant
Green or even a Brett Jackson type. I really like Minor, and I think
he'll be a big leaguer, but the consensus is simply that he's not a
front-of-the-rotation guy. If I'm picking in the top 10, I want a guy
with star potential, and I don't think Minor fits that description.
Kristin (Chicago): Where's the Rosenblog? It's my favorite part of this site during the CWS.
It's coming, don't worry! We'll get that baby humming along starting today.
Steven Matz (Flushing, NY): Was I worth the 72nd pick by the Mets or should they have gone for a better talent with signability issues?
I've got no problem with the Matz pick; he
does have a lot of upside, and the consensus in the Northeast was that
he was a late second- to third-round talent. Matz has run his fastball
up to 94 from the left side and shown a good breaking ball at times,
and there's tons of projection with him.
Jon Bell (McChord AFB, WA): What has to go right for Arkansas to upset CSF tomorrow?
Dallas Keuchel has to be really, really on
his game. He's got to keep the Fullerton running game in check, which
he should be able to at least a bit as a veteran lefthander. I expect
the Razorbacks to score a few runs, so the question will be whether
they can hold down CSF's red-hot offense? I certainly wouldn't bet on
it, but it all hinges on Keuchel.
Doug Corbett (Charlottesville, VA): What does UVA need to do to win the CWS
Keep on keepin' on. Virginia has played
like a national championship-caliber team over the last three weeks.
Beating LSU in the opener will be critical, because while UVa. has one
of the deeper staffs in Omaha, I'm still not convinced it's deep enough
to run through the loser's bracket. Fortunately, I think Danny Hultzen
gives the Cavs a real, real good shot in that opener. In fact, I'm
picking UVa. to beat LSU in that first game.
John R (Houston): What is the chance Ryan Berry goes back to school next year? Do you think it was a good pick by the Orioles?
I can tell you this: the Orioles would not
have drafted Berry in the ninth round if they didn't think they could
sign him. According to some scouts, Berry was telling clubs earlier
this spring that he would not sign unless he was drafted in the first
round (even if he were offered first-round money later in the draft,
which doesn't make much sense to me), but perhaps that position has
softened somewhat. I do think there's a real chance he could go back to
school, but I know the Orioles were ecstatic to get him where they did.
That one's a coin flip, if you ask me. I do think it was a great pick
for Baltimore; the O's got a guy who looked like a first-rounder in
March, but they got him in the ninth round. Great value, and even if
they don't sign him, it was worth taking a shot.
Arthur (Chapel Hill, NC): Hi Aaron,
UNC pitching and hitting have both been pretty impressive lately (not
that ASU's haven't been), and I like the fact that UNC's entire order
is producing right now. If ASU throws Leake vs UNC and White, who do
you like to win that contest?
That's a pick 'em; I would pick UNC, but
John Manuel has said he would pick Arizona State. I just think North
Carolina's Omaha experience could loom large against that very young
ASU team. And I feel like White usually peaks this time of year (he
looked very good last week), while the less-physical Leake might be
more likely to feel the effects of his heavy workload (and he wasn't as
sharp last week as he has been all season). Don't forget, Leake has
thrown 133 innings this year, and White has thrown 98. I'll take the
bigger, fresher pitcher who has more explosive stuff anyway.
Carlos (San Diego, CA): It seems the Padres
rolled the dice in the draft taking Tate and another toolsy high school
outfielder (E. Williams). I admire their newfound moxy but how risky
are these picks and what are the best and worst case scenarios for each
I think the Tate pick was really risky,
largely because he's going to be a very, very difficult sign. Scouts
down in Georgia have serious questions about whether he's actually
mentally ready to go out and play pro ball right now. Of course, the
Padres can probably afford to make their best run at him, and if it
doesn't work out they can take the compensation pick in next year's
loaded draft. Obviously that situation is not ideal, because first of
all they like Tate and he has a ton of upside, second of all you want
to get your top picks in your system and progressing as soon as you
can, and third you lose leverage with your compensation pick since you
lose it if you don't sign the player. But I expect a couple of
first-round negotiations this year to go that route, and there's a
chance it could happen with Tate. More to your question, there is risk
even if he does sign, because his bat is by no means a sure thing.
Still, I really like San Diego's approach this year; grabbing safer
lower-upside college players has really not panned out over the last
few years, so what did they have to lose by being aggressive and going
after these intriguing prep talents? Williams, by the way, was a great
value at pick No. 52; he has first-round talent.
OK everyone, sorry to make this short and
sweet, but that's all I've got time for today. Enjoy the College World
Series, and keep those comments coming over on the Rosenblog. Hang
tight for a few minutes, and Jim Callis will be along shortly.
Peter Friberg (San Diego): Did you see
Matzek's interview on MLB TV on day 1 refer to Oregon & playing 1B.
How likely is it he doesn't want to pitch in Colorado (Padre fan here -
I love the Rockies fist 3 picks)?
Hi, everyone, Jim Callis taking over for
Aaron now. I can't believe he just picked Mike Leake not to win! And
I'll throw in my two cents on Berry—I don't think he'll sign. He
wanted to go in the top two rounds and his shoulder is too iffy to give
him that kind of money . . . Now on to Peter's question. I wouldn't
read too much into Matzek's comment. He looked like a high school kid
caught in the headlights during that interview. My question, and I
don't know the answer yet, is how much Matzek and the Rockies talked
before the draft. Clubs were told it would take precedent-setting money
to sign him, which means more than $7 million. Can't see the Rockies
really spending that much, and they may have just taken him and will
see where negotiations take them. I don't think he's shying away from
Colorado, but he won't be an easy sign.
Ace (Detroit, MI): Was it true that the Royals
were considering taking Wil Myers in the 1st round at #12 and if so was
it a great bargain to grab him in the 3rd rounds? Is it possible Myers
sticks as a Catcher?
I heard they talked money with Myers at
No. 12 and couldn't reach an agreement. Whether they would have taken
him over Aaron Crow remains to be seen, but as it turned out they got
both. Reported asking price on Myers is $2 million. If they sign him,
that's a bargain talent-wise for a third-rounder. He should hit, has a
good chance to stick at catcher, and is athletic enough to play a
variety of other positions if he has to move. He won't just be
relegated to first base.
Richard (Boston): Jim, please discuss the
Redsox draft picks, specifically players that fall into the
"signability" category. They apparently have already signed their 10th
round pick for second round money, and I am looking to see what other
impact players they selcted this year.
Sure. Hadn't seen that they had signed
football standout Brandon Jacobs in the 10th round, but I'll take your
word for it. Other big-ticket draftees for the Red Sox include Texas
A&M RHP Alex Wilson (second round; wanted $1.5 million and turned
down $600,000 last summer); Mississippi HS SS/RHP/QB David Renfroe
(third round; similar to 2008 first-rounder Casey Kelly and it may cost
the same $3 million to sign him); South Carolina HS RHP Madison
Younginer (seventh round; ranked No. 50 by BA in our final predraft
rankings); and Baylor RHP Kendal Volz (ninth round; projected as a
possible top 10 pick before a disappointing junior season).
Steve (Wilmington): My favorite team (the
Phillies) seemed to manage the draft so that they wouldn't go overslot
with their first 4 picks (Rounds 2-5) but then might go over slot in
later rounds. Is there something to this? I believe they will break
slot in this draft. Does it matter to the Commissioner when (or where)
you break slot?
I think the Phillies are going to be
aggressive. MLB doesn't want clubs busting slot, so where they do
doesn't matter, though it gets more expensive closer to the top of the
draft. And I don't agree on rounds 2-5, as I think OF Kyrell Hudson
(third round) is going to get an above-slot deal. I think you're right
about them busting slot in the later rounds, with guys like Louisiana
HS RHP Brody Colvin (seventh round), California HS 1B Jonathan
Singleton (eighth) and California HS C Andrew Susac (16th).
Jeff (San Marcos, CA): The Padres have to be
one of the winners in the draft. Tate and Williams were good but I like
Keyvius Sampson at four. James Needy at six has ton of upside. Kendall
Korbal and Lollis are player that can be a steal.
This isn't your father's Padres draft.
They were very aggressive this year and chased a lot of upside. There's
some risk involved, sure, but potentially a ton of reward. Georgia HS
outfielder Donavan Tate was the best athlete in the draft, and while I
personally wouldn't have picked him at No. 3, he certainly has the
tools to merit the selection. I thought Texas HS Everett Williams was a
cinch first-rounder. Of all the athletic outfielders in this draft,
he's the best hitter. Can't believe the Padres got him at No. 52. I
liked several of their later picks as well.
JC (St. Louis): What do you think Shelby
Miller will require to sign him? Slot for #19 is roughly $1.4M but he
is rumored to want roughly $4M. Arguably a Top 10 talent in the draft
he will command more than the $1.4M. So you see a common ground? Maybe
$3M? Thanks Jim!
I think the Cardinals will get him signed,
for a figure closer to the slot ($1.386 million, by my calculations)
than to his $4 million asking price. And he's a great value talent-wise
at No. 19.
Derick (PA): Hey Jim, I'm wondering how you
grade the Orioles draft. I think Hobgood, regardless of what Joe Jordan
says, was a signability issue. Let's just say that's the case, if so,
did Baltimore make up for by drafting any high upside guys who are
considered tough signs, or is their budget down for this years draft? I
really like the Givens pick, as well as Berry from Rice.
No team is going to come out and say, "Our
first-rounder was a signability guy." I believe the Orioles
legitimately liked Hobgood, and I believe we underrated him in our
rankings a little, but he was at best the sixth-best HS pitcher in the
draft—and he went No. 5. It's no coincidence that he'll probably sign
for below-slot money ($2.25 million) at No. 5, and the five elite HS
arms wouldn't. SS Mychal Givens is a high-upside pick in the second
round. As I said earlier, I don't see Berry signing. But San Jacinto
(Texas) JC RHP Jacob Cowan could be a steal in the 10th round.
Steve (Virginia): Jim, whats your take on the
Pirates draft. I know Sanchez is a reach but considering what they did
later, do you think they have one of the top classes?
We need to see who winds up signing.
Sanchez was an overdraft, but the Pirates have vowed that wasn't a
financial move. They didn't think the options who fit their talent wise
were worth their asking prices, and they saved on Sanchez to spend
elsewhere. Essentially, it's as if they traded the No. 4 pick for a
couple of late first-rounders, assuming they get guys signed. Overall,
I liked their other picks, and they have several signability guys who
will be very nice signs if they land them, among them Louisiana HS RHP
Zack Von Rosenberg (sixth round), Arizona HS RHP Trent Stevenson
(seventh), Texas HS LHP Colton Cain (eighth) and Florida OF Matt den
Adam (Warehouse North): Jim,
What's the draft like for you and seeing how all the information you've
received plays out? Do you find there were players who may have been a
little higher or lesser regarded than you were led to believe? Thanks.
It is fun seeing where guys go when the
draft actually starts. We get feedback all spring on our ratings, so we
knew the industry liked Matt Hobgood higher than we had him ranked.
Also cool to see John Manuel stick his neck out on a guy like Florida
HS OF LeVon Washington, get told that we have him too high, then see
him go in the first round. I worked the phones furiously until 90
minutes before the draft to find out how picks would play out, then had
to go into rehearsals for the draft show on MLB Network. I knew the
first seven picks before they happened, but didn't know the Reds would
pass on Alex White, apparently for financial reasons. At that point,
the draft really got interesting for me.
Kyle (Illinois): What was your take on the Cardinals draft?
Loved the Shelby Miller pick at No. 19, as
stated. Not sure I buy Southern California's Robert Stock (second
round) as a catcher, but he may be an interesting pitcher if he's
willing to do that. Relievers Joe Kelly (third) and Scott Bittle
(fourth) could get to St. Louis quick. Rest of the draft looks solid,
but the definite highlight was stealing Miller at No. 19. That, and
former BA staffer Matt Blood getting four draftees in his first year as
a Cardinals area scout.
Mookie (Queens, NY): Can the Mets and other teams afford to lose their first round pick every year and still hope to have a decent farm system?
Sure, provided your willing to spend on
first-round talents who fall in the draft. The Mets haven't shown much
willingness to do that, though.
Mark (NYC): Look at the Red Sox draft and what
they will spend and what the Yankees drafted and what they will spend.
What happened with Yanks?? The Sox may spend 2 times what the Yankees
will spend and maybe more. Have the Yanks become a small market team in
Yankees? Small market? Ha. The Yankees may
have a tighter budget than they've had in the past, but they'll still
spend more than the average club. Don't be surprised if first-rounder
Slade Heathcott costs close to $2.5 million. But you're not alone,
Mark. I'm getting lots of e-mail fans from Yankees fans unhappy about
their draft relative to Boston's.
Mike (Phoenix): Is it just me, or would a
combination of Mike Leakes intangibles combined with Steven Strasburghs
stuff, be the best pitcher ever?
Well, Strasburg's intangibles aren't
horrible and he's still considered the best draft pitcher ever without
Leake's. But I know what you're saying. Leake might have the best
makeup in the draft. I hope Aaron Fitt apologizes to him after he beats
the Tar Heels.
Jude (Ft. Lauderdale, FL): What are the chances that Bryce Harper gets his GED to become eligible for next year's draft?
The GED alone wouldn't make Harper
eligible, because his high school class wouldn't have graduated. The
GED would, however, allow him to play in junior college, and all juco
players are eligible. I'll be shocked if Harper doesn't take this path.
He'll be the top prospect for the 2010 draft, well ahead of the field
much the same way Strasburg was this year.
Brian (Phoenix): Any idea on Chris Dwyer's asking price and do you like the Royals selection of him in the 4th round?
I don't know his asking price. He does
have extra leverage as the rare freshman-eligible, but at the same time
he's also 21 and he's not going to have a ton of leverage as a
23-year-old junior in two years. I do like the pick, thought he was a
sandwich/second-round talent, so that's good value.
Doug (Motown): Scheppers lasted a long time
for a guy who hit a 100mph last weekend. Hard to believe nobody took a
chance on him before that. Do you think there are medical issues that
we as fans just don't know about?
Scheppers could be a huge steal at No. 44.
I don't think there's a medical issue we don't know about—we know
about his shoulder, which knocked him out of the top 10 picks in 2008.
He got a clean bill of health from Dr. Lewis Yocum this spring, but
teams are still wary of shoulder issues. I also don't think there was a
good sense of his asking price even a day before the draft.
Bob (CA): No prospect hot sheet this week?
You'll get a PHS later today. Webmaster
J.J. Cooper is slaving away on the draft and the College World Series,
but it's on his to-do list for the site.
Nate (Minneapolis): Do you think that Gibson was worth the risk for the Twins? And what kind of potential does he have?
Loved that pick, and a lot of you know I
love Kyle Gibson as a prospect. If he were healthy, he would have been
my personal No. 4 pick behind Strasburg, Ackley and Matzek. I wonder if
the Pirates would have taken a healthy Gibson at No. 4. It's a stress
fracture in his forearm, it's not his shoulder or elbow, it doesn't
require surgery. I think that's going to be a great pick for the Twins.
vinny (long island ny): who does slade heathcott compare to at the major league level?
I'm not saying he's good, but his huge
upside as a two-way player makes me think of Josh Hamilton issue. So do
his makeup issues, though they're nowhere near as severe as Hamilton's
Brad (Phoenix): Why did Deven Marrero slip so low in the draft? Do you think he will end up at ASU now?
The answer to this type of question almost
always is signability. He went in the 17th round to the Reds, and I
don't know his asking price. But the Reds aren't really a big-budget
draft team, so if I have to guess, I think he does become a Sun Devil.
Brady (Dallas): Thoughts on the Rangers picking Purke over Miller? Good choice?
They're very close in talent. I think Purke is a little better, either would have been a fine choice.
Pete (Albany, NY): Hi Jim. What do you think
about the Braves draft? Seems like they went in a new direction with a
lot of college picks. Did any impact bats, which they greatly need to
develop throughout the system, jump out at you? Any other interesting
picks with high upside?
Few teams scout junior colleges as
thoroughly as the Braves, and for the second straight year, they
pounded juco picks in the draft. I'll be honest, I don't love their
draft at this point. They limited themselves to slot guys at No. 7, and
while I acknowledge that Vanderbilt lefty Mike Minor can pitch, he
doesn't blow me away that high in the draft. The first position player
they draft, juco SS Mycal Jones (fourth) is more of an athlete than a
hitter, and I don't see that impact bat you're looking for.
Ryan (PA): Hey Jim, Is there any comparison
between Mike Stanton coming out of HS and Kelly Dugan? Or does it end
at that they went to the same HS?
Not really. Dugan, the Phillies' top choice (second round), is a good athlete, but Stanton is a great athlete. Not comparable.
Joseph (Fort Worth, TX): Thanks for the chat
Jim! I know Tommy Medonca has power and solid defense, but do you think
he will ever hit enough to be a solid big league regular?
That's the big question. Don't mind the
pick at all in the second round, but his ability to make consistent
contact is an issue.
Elliot (Youngstown OH): Jim, Does it make
sense for the Indians to declare immediately that they want to convert
both Alex White and Joe Gardner into relievers? Is that the best role
for both? How does it affect signing negotiations?
I haven't seen that quote but I've been
asked about it a few times. I definitely see that as Gardner's role,
because he's more of a one-pitch guy. Several clubs projected that
White might end up in the bullpen, but I'd give him every chance to
Alex (STL): I read some reports that Shelby
Miller struggled in his last couple of starts with command and
velocity. Is this why he fell and is he healthy? Thanks!
No. It was all signability after he asked
for $4 million shortly before the draft. He pitched on short rest in
his final outing but before that his pure stuff (moreso than command)
looked very, very good.
Deanna (DC): Would Harper have gone #2 this year if he were in the draft?
Yes, unless signability scared the Mariners off.
Derick (PA): It seems to me that Aaron Crow
would have made a lot more sense for Baltimore at #5 than Hobgood. I
say this only because Tillman, Matusz, Arrieta, and Patton will
probably be in Baltimore at some point next year and Erbe not too far
behind, I believe Crow could get there around the same time. That'd be
a pretty darn rotation and, to me, make more sense than having Hobgood
up in 3-4 years.
I don't disagree. But I'm guessing Crow wants roughly twice what Hobgood does, which played into Baltimore's decision.
JAYPERS (IL): Chances of Strasburg signing any earlier than 11:59 pm on 8/17?
Next to nil. Unless the Nationals meet the $50 million asking price, Strasburg and Scott Boras will be content to wait.
JC (St. Louis): Speaking of Harper...if he is
eligible in next years draft and he signs on with say....Mr. Boras Inc.
and performs in the next year as expected what kind of $$ figure is he
going to command next year? I am sure it will hinge a bit on the
Strasburg deal wouldn't it? Also if the Nats get the #1 pick again
would they take Harper in your opinion after shelling out record money
in this year draft like they will most likely do? If so they might be
getting 2 of the most dynamic players in the draft in
years...Washington could be in contention in the semi-near future.
Oh, he's already being advised by the
Scott Boras Corp. I'm sure he will use the Strasburg deal as a starting
point. If I'm the Nationals, I take both guys and pay to sign both guys
if I think they're the best player each year. Yes, they'd be arguably
the best pitching prospect and hitting prospect in draft history.
That's all I can get to today. Thanks for the great questions.