College Top 25 Chat: April 19
Hello everyone — I'll be starting in just a couple of minutes. Sorry for the delay.
Jeramey (Atlanta): Florida State's Tyler Holt
is a stud, however their hasn't been much talk of him being drafted?
What round do you think he get's drafted in, and is their any chance he
comes back for his senior season?
OK, let's get to it. Holt is indeed a heck
of a player, a true leadoff man who brings so much energy and simply
knows how to win. He projects as a third- or fourth-round pick, because
he lacks the physicality or the elite speed to profile as a true
everyday center fielder in the big leagues. I could see him carving out
a nice career as a fourth outfielder in the majors, though.
Devin (Louisville, KY): With Arkansas winning
11 Straight games and looking good right now, What is the thinking
behind not moving them up in the Top 25?
Well, every team in the top 13 except UCLA
won its weekend series. There wasn't much room for movement for anyone.
But I will say this: I think I like Arkansas the best of that group of
four SEC teams that are in a bunch in the back of the top 10. The Hogs
are healthy, I like how the pitching has stabilized, and Mike Bolsinger
fits very well in the bullpen, I think. They're also a lot more
dangerous offensively than they were a year ago — and that team went
to Omaha. Check out today's Three Strikes for a Golden Spikes Spotlight
on Zack Cox.
Chip (Fort Worth): Considering FSU and Florida
both lost two games during last weeks action, is the Staff waiting to
see the outcome of this weekends road trip at Florida before they
decide to move the Razorbacks further up in the statndings? Seems they
could have moved up this week along with LSU.
Just to follow up on the last answer — in
order to move Arkansas up, you'd really have to move LSU and South
Carolina up as well, because all three had similar weeks and have
similar resumes. That means you'd have to move Florida State and
Florida each down three spots to make room for those other SEC teams to
move up, and we weren't going to move FSU and Florida down after each
won a conference road series. As you should all know by now, we put a
lot of stock in winning weekend series, and if you win a conference
road series, we're generally not going to move you down in the rankings.
Nick (Dallas): How impressive was TCU's 4-0 week? Do they have the potential to earn a Super Regional at home?
That was a very important week for TCU
mostly because it really needed to win that midweek game against Texas
A&M, but certainly sweeping a road series in conference is huge —
especially after BYU just took two games from Kansas State. If TCU is
competing with a Big 12 team for a regional hosting spot, this week
could be a major factor in TCU's favor. Kansas State is the No. 2 team
in the Big 12 right now, and it went 0-2 at BYU, which was swept at
home immediately after that by TCU. I do think TCU has a chance at a
national seed, but its RPI will take another hit by four games left
against Air Force, plus three against Cal State Bakersfield. It's more
likely that TCU hosts a regional but could wind up on the road in super
regionals. Regardless, this feels like the year the Horned Frogs break
through to Omaha.
Arkham (Danville, PA): Thanks for the chat, Aaron. UCLA's weekend: Speed bump, pothole or detour on the road to Omaha?
Let's call it a pothole. As talented as
UCLA is — on the mound, especially — the fact is the Bruins were
playing a bit above their heads in that 22-0 start. This team is far
from a lock to reach Omaha - it is relying on some young players in the
lineup who will have their ups and downs, and as overpowering as Cole
and Bauer can be, clearly they are not yet finished products and they
can be beaten. I think the Bruins will bounce back and win that series
at Arizona next week, but I could also see them sinking into a bit of a
Justin (Springdale Arkansas): How high do you
see Zach Cox, Andy Wilkins, and Brett Eibner going in this years MLB
draft and what do you think are the Hogs chances of getting them back
for next season?
None of them will be back — you can take
that to the bank. Cox is a lock first-rounder, and Eibner will probably
go in the first round or sandwich round, as a pitcher. Wilkins will
probably go in the top three rounds because of his power bat.
Chuck (Wichita): Still no K-State even after a sweep of Baylor?
If the Wildcats hadn't been swept in that
midweek series at BYU, they would have been ranked for sure. Even if
they had just split those games, it would have been an easy decision.
But BYU is 16-19; you can't get swept in those games (and give up 28
runs in two games) if you're a Top 25 team.
Dave (Columbia, SC): Who do you see as the top 8 national seeds? How about 3-4 teams with a chance to work into the mix.
Right now, I'd have to go with Arizona
State, Virginia, Texas, Georgia Tech, UCLA, Arkansas and two of these
three SEC teams: Florida, LSU and South Carolina. Other teams in the
mix: Florida State, Miami, Coastal Carolina, TCU, Louisville.
Bill (Hamilton, Nj): Looking at the updated
RPI, seems 4 Big East teams are in the mix for regional bids. With
Rutgers leading the conference and UConn and Louisville doing very well
in the RPI, does Pitt stand a decent chance to get a 4th BE bid for the
NCAA's? They did win a series at home vs Louisville, but lost a road
series at Rutgers. Does the UConn series in a few weeks essentially
become a "red chip" series for getting an NCAA bid? Pitt has played a
few good teams OOC, but they have no wins that jump out at you.
Conversely, U Conn has wins over Ohio St, USC and Minnesota , along
with a series with at Northridge. What's your take?
I think Louisville is a lock, leaving
UConn, Pitt and Rutgers to battle for two more spots. It just seems
extremely unlikely that the committee is going to take four teams from
the Big East, even though it's a strong year in that conference. UConn
and Rutgers have played stronger nonconference schedules, but neither
of them has anything on their resume that matches Pitt's series win
against Louisville. I like UConn the best of those three teams from a
talent standpoint, so I'd bet on UConn finishing strong and getting in.
Hard to choose between Pitt and Rutgers for a third team — and there's
no guarantee the Big East gets three. In light of the way the committee
shafted Rhode Island, Eastern Illinois and Missouri State last year,
it's hard to see the committee giving the benefit of the doubt to any
cold-weather mid-majors this year.
Jim (Oakland): Aaron,
How many teams do you see from the Big West getting into the tournament
and do you think Riverside has a chance to be one of them.
Remarkably, the Big West would probably be
a two-bid league if we did an updated projection today. We included
Long Beach in our midseason projection, and the Dirtbags have since
dropped back-to-back series against Davis and Riverside. Pacific just
won a series against Irvine and has put together a nice little resume
(including decent nonconference series wins against San Francisco,
Nevada, Southern California and San Jose State, plus a midweek win
against Stanford), but Pacific is 106th in the RPI — that's not
at-large territory. Right now, I think Pacific is deserving of a bid,
but the committee places a lot of weight on the RPI, and that's bad
news for the Tigers. The same goes for Riverside (79th in the RPI),
which lost a series to Pacific last weekend. The Highlanders need to
get hot and pad their overall record, because 17-13 is certainly not
going to overcome their mediocre RPI.
Kyle (Fayetteville): We aren't so early in the
season anymore and conference records and standings are starting to
mean more. When are the conference records going to start work
themselves out in the rankings (especially as we see teams like UF,
FSU, and UCLA continue to go 2-2, 3-2, etc each week while teams behind
them go unblemished against good competition)?
So if two teams are separated by a game or
two in the standings, should we rig the rankings to always have the
teams higher in the standings ahead? What if Team A has put together a
better conference record by sweeping the weaker teams in the league,
while Team B has won two of three every week against the best teams in
the league? Which team is more deserving? I'd take the team that has
won series against better competition in that hypothetical. If you just
want the rankings to reflect conference records, why even look at the
rankings? Just look at the conference standings.
Todd (My mom's basement): This weekend: FSU or Miami? Discuss
I like the Seminoles at home in this one.
Give Miami credit for taking care of business against the softer part
of its conference schedule, but the Hurricanes could find the sledding
tougher with series at Florida State and Georgia Tech and home against
Virginia in three of their next four series. I just continue to believe
Florida State is better this year than Miami is, that series is in
Dave (Orlando): Aaron, does Ole Miss have enough pitching behind Pomeranz to make a run at Omaha this season?
I have my doubts. Aaron Barrett can be
very good at times, but how reliable is he? And the Sunday job has been
a revolving door. I think Mississippi is a CWS contender largely
because Pomeranz is the best pitcher in the nation and the lineup is
pretty good and they're a good defensive team, but gun to my head, I'd
say they don't make it to Omaha because of the rest of the staff.
JohnD (Dripping Springs, TX): This is
something that I have noticed week in and week out from BA's College
Ranking. Kansas State is in every poll (As high as #16 this week), but
nowhere to be seen on BA's. Do you just not like KSU or what? What's
your reasoning behind it? A excellent overall record and being 9-3 in
the Big XII is impressive. Sweeping a hot Baylor team is even more
impressive. I figure you will say that hey they have played a weak
schedule, but if that's the case you are weighing much too heavily on
that statement. They have beaten some decent to good teams over and
over again. I would like your thoughts. They need to be given credit
where credit is deserved.
I talked a bit about this earlier, but the
only reason Kansas State is not ranked this week is because it was
swept at BYU. But I spoke with Brad Hill last week, and even he
acknowledged that Kansas State's schedule is back-loaded, with series
against Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas and Texas A&M the final four weeks.
Don't get me wrong, I'm very impressed with that sweep of Baylor, and
we were ready to bring whoever won that series into the rankings this
week... but then K-State was swept in two midweek games at BYU. A team
might stay put in our rankings after losing one midweek game, and it
might even move up a spot or two depending on what other teams have
done, but you're not usually going to see a team move into the rankings
after dropping two midweek games against a non-regional team.
Tornado Tony (Texarkana): Aaron, my old pal.
I'm a little bumfuzzled not seeing Rice in dem rankings of yours. They
just picked up a big road series win against a real good team from down
south. I mean, they gotta win every durn game they play? What more them
boys gotta do?
Rice is close to getting back in. If we
were going to rank a team with 15 losses this week, it probably would
have been San Diego, which did win a head-to-head series against Rice,
but we figured we'd just wait another week before bringing in either
team. A 3-1 week against A&M and ECU ought to get the Owls back in
the Top 25.
Jesse (Portland): Is Hultzen moving up the
list of top 2011 pitchers with his consistently strong performances? Is
he in the discussion with the likes of Cole, Gray, Jungmann, etc...?
I think he's always been roughly in that
discussion — he ranked No. 79 in our overall Top 200 prospects list
for the 2008 draft, ahead of Jungmann and just a few spots behind Zack
Cox. He's an outstanding prospect, a likely first-round pick, though
his stuff isn't as overpowering as Cole's or Jungmann's, so he's still
a tick behind those guys.
Richard (TALLAHSSEE, FL): Aaron, what's the
deal with ASU being back at #1... The reason I ask that is take the
next 6 teams have played considerably more Top 25 teams, UVA(15),
Texas(9), Geogia Tech(6), UCLA(7), FSU(13), & UF(13), while ASU has
played 1. Now I know that some of the teams counted in those numbers
are no longer Top 25 but how does a team like ASU jump back to #1 by
just sweeping USC after losing a weekend series to WaSU... It just
doesn't make sense with those tougher schedules in the Top 10...So how
are they #1?
Well, it's worth noting that Arizona State
is also 12-1 against Cal, Fullerton, Auburn, Oregon and San Diego —
all of whom have been ranked at some point this season, just not when
they faced ASU. So that 1-0 vs. Top 25 number is a bit misleading. This
week, Virginia didn't move up because it went just 2-2, but it also
didn't move down because it won a weekend series against a ranked team.
That's the kind of week that causes a team to hold its ground. So we
moved Arizona State up from No. 3. The Sun Devils are 31-3 against a
very solid schedule — that's good enough for me.
nilgai (South Texas): Texas leads the Big12 in
runs scored. What sort of stock would you put into this statistic? Is
it actually possible that Texas has the best offense in the Big12?
Why not? Who's got a better offense? The
Big 12 is down this year — aside from Texas, there is not an elite
team in the league. Texas does not have an elite offense, but I could
believe that it's actually better than any other offense in that
league. There are some quality veterans and talented young players in
that Longhorn lineup, and we know they're going to execute.
Bryan (San Francisco): Any talk of Cal's
Justin Jones for National Freshman of the Year? I know everyone is high
on Purke (who is obviously a better pro prospect) but Jones numbers are
far superior against better teams. Thanks!
Certainly Justin Jones is on the short
list, along with Arizona's Kurt Heyer. Check out the Marquee Mound
Matchup section of last week's Weekend Preview for more on Jones.
Kevin Conroy (Iwakuni Japan): Greetings Aaron,
The Titans appear to be back on track after a slow start. Do you see
them as one of the favorites to make it back to Omaha and win a 5th
national championship? Also, what do you make of Noe Ramirez's injury?
How long will he be out? Thanks for your great analysis.
I have never stopped believing this year
that Fullerton will be in Omaha, and I continue to believe that. It
doesn't sound like Ramirez will miss too much time — hopefully we'll
have more info soon.
Eliezer (Long Island, NY): Where is the love
for Liberty (Flames) and the pursuit for happiness which is being in
the top 25? They obliterate VMI who was on the radar as a top 25 team
and still Liberty gets very little if almost nothing in terms of votes.
What does Liberty (#39 RPI on Boyds) need to do to get some justice?
How do you know they didn't get any votes?
We don't have votes, and we don't list "others receiving votes." We did
look at Liberty this week — that was an impressive sweep of VMI, and
it has landed Liberty very much on our radar, but the Flames don't have
a Top 25-caliber resume quite yet.
Bob (Chicago, IL): Simple question for you Aaron. 5 words. Coastal - National Seed or not?
Probably not. But I do think you'll see Coastal in Omaha this year.
OK folks, that's it for today. Until next week...