Many of you have e-mailed me in the last couple of weeks asking for reaction on the Nationals’ situation regarding Esmailyn Gonzalez, who used a false identity and is really 23 years old, not 19 as he had claimed.
I’m not much for knee-jerk reactions for anything regarding Latin America, particularly when it comes to a situation with as many layers as this one. It’s a nuanced subject, and the fallout could extend to teams beyond the Nationals and to other prominent prospects.
"There were a number of people involved in it," Nationals president Stan Kasten said. "When you guys learn . . . the lengths these participants went to perpetrate this fraud, you’re gonna be amazed. Falsified hospital documents. Falsified school documents. Other family members changing their identities. Bribes were paid. Really elaborate stuff. And I have to give MLB’s department of investigations a lot of credit. They really do deserve a lot of credit for finally cracking through this."
Through conversations with scouts in Latin America over the last two weeks, two reactions have been prevalent:
1. Lack of surprise
After signing Gonzalez for a club-record $1.4 million bonus on July 2, 2006, the Nationals trumpeted not just the player but the signing bonus in a press release, announcing that they would become a major player in Latin America. The immediate reaction from international scouts went something along the lines of, "You’re kidding, right?" International scouts were floored by the amount of money the Nationals gave Gonzalez to sign, calling the bonus exorbitant for a player of his caliber. One international scouting director said his team really liked Gonzalez—if he was willing to sign for $200,000 or so.
But that there was a large disparity between the international scouting consensus on Gonzalez’s value compared to what the Nationals gave him isn’t itself all that rare. In the vast majority of cases, the team that signs a player is the one that values him the most and, arguably, overvalues the player; the team that signs the player has valued him at a higher price than all 29 other teams were willing to pay. So, aside from teams constrained by their budgets, the other 29 teams will see almost any significant signing as an overpay.
Evaluating 15- and 16-year-old baseball players anywhere isn’t easy. That challenge combined with the additional uncertainty of information that scouts have when evaluating Latin American amateurs can lead to wildly divergent player evaluations.
But the Gonzalez signing elicited more raised eyebrows than usual, and there have been questions about Gonzalez’s age since 2006. Since then, the Nationals have been one of the clubs rumored to be involved in investigations concerning bonus skimming and other improprieties in international scouting. Despite the team’s profession that it would become an international heavyweight, Washington has been relatively dormant in Latin America, signing only one player to a six-figure bonus since the beginning of 2008. And that one player, Elvin Cuello ($150,000), turned out to be using a false identity himself.
"The funny thing is everyone knows about it now, but I’ve been hearing about this stuff (with Gonzalez) for two years," said one international scouting director. "In the industry, we know. The ones of us that are working Latin America, we know."
2. Disappointment
While we don’t know for certain the facts in the Gonzalez case, shady dealings have gone on in Latin America for decades. Many scouts in Latin America are operating on the level, but scouts from the White Sox, Red Sox and Yankees have been fired within the last 12 months with allegations of bonus skimming, either outright taking money from the player or working in conjunction with the player to forge documents and artificially inflate his value. Now Jose Rijo, who ran Dominican operations for the Nationals, and general manager Jim Bowden are no longer with the organization.
"They’re doing stuff about it," said one international scouting director. "These kind of things have been existing in Latin America for a lot of time, and they happen more than a lot of people believe."
Furthermore, the Gonzalez case reinforces that scouting Latin America is a completely different animal from scouting amateur talent in the United States. Scouts would prefer to simply do what they are passionate about—evaluate young baseball talent—but the Gonzalez saga only serves as a reminder that talent evaluation is only part of the job. Being able to accurately identify a player’s true age and identity is a frustratingly important task, and Major League Baseball’s department of investigations and even the U.S. consulate can’t provide an infallible safety net to catch every player using a false identity.
Are there other Latin American prospects lying about their ages? Undoubtedly, yes. There are players in the Dominican Summer League and in the higher levels of the minor leagues who teams privately acknowledge are older than their listed age, while other players have questions about their ages from people throughout the industry.
We reported one year ago at this time that MLB had fired three of its investigators working in the Dominican Republic, though MLB did not acknowledge why those investigators were fired. Now Melissa Segura of SI.com is reporting that MLB fired at least one of the investigators for accepting a bribe to fix an investigation, confirming rumors we at BA have heard for some time. Money has a powerful influence anywhere, and especially so in Latin America.
In the last few months, MLB has caught several players using false identities who had agreed to six-figure bonus terms with teams and placed those players on the suspended list. The investigations process seems to be getting better, but some players will always slip through the cracks. It took MLB nearly two and a half years to determine that Gonzalez was lying about his age. And, if Kasten’s opening remarks from his press conference are accurate—that he was persistently pushing MLB to investigate the signing after it had already been made official—then give Kasten credit. The Nationals could have ignored or tried to sweep the problem under the rug while still parting ways with Bowden and Rijo, avoiding much of the negative publicity they have received in recent weeks.
Whether MLB will continue to investigate other minor league prospects remains to be seen, but Gonzalez was only one high-profile player who happened to get caught.
|
Comments will be monitored prior to being added to the site. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be rejected. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We have chosen to open up commenting to everyone, so comment away! We want to hear from each and every one of you! Leave a comment. |
About This Blog
Categories
Archives
Syndicate This Blog
Blogs
BaseballAmerica.com
Search This Blog
The only reason any of these baseball execs are mad is because they could have gotten the players cheaper. Look at Miguel Tejada, Ramon Ortiz, and hundreds of other Latin players who have done well or great in MLB who would not have had careers except for changing their ages. I have played with and against guys all over the world who are not the age they say they are. When you are the 2nd most racist organaization in the world(MLB) and descriminate for age and race and gender, you get what you get. Also, any job where they tell you that at 23 you are too old to play needs to take a look at the way they work. I played 13 years, in 6 countries, pitched over 1500 pro innings, and made anywhere between $850 and $30,000 a month to play. Had I not changed my age I never would have had a chance at a baseball career. I have since managed and coached in pro ball, HS, and JC and definitely would not be where I’m at without changing my age. I never took a PED and earned every win and dollar through my career. I think it’s time for this age BS and the descrimination to stop. You should remember that your never too old, Jaime Moyer, or to small, Dustin Pedroia, to play baseball.
Posted by Will Flynt | March 5, 2009 at 1:49 pm | ShortcutIn my opinion, the best hitter in baseball right now(Pujols) is at least 32-33…not 29. On the other hand Will, that is a total cop out to say that you have to lie about your age to succeed. That’s the same **** I hear about the steroid issue. The accurate statement would be that it is harder to make it with pure talent and old fashioned hard work.
Posted by Joseph Wall | March 5, 2009 at 3:50 pm | ShortcutWill,
It is not surprising that you would lie about your age, seeing that you were also one of the first to cross the picket line back in the strike days. It is called ethics and doing what is right, not just looking out for yourself. The game is bigger than you, and bigger than me, and will be here long after you and I are gone, but the only thing to live on after you pass is your legacy. If you would like to be remembered as someone who only does what is best for him, by all means go ahead.
Posted by Larry Guilbaur | March 6, 2009 at 10:21 am | ShortcutIs there any opportunity for the Nationals to try and recoup some of the $1.4 million from Gonzalez? I doubt it would be simple, but even the effort would serve as some form of deterrent to others.
Posted by John | March 6, 2009 at 11:44 am | ShortcutI’m sure the Nationals will look into whatever options for recourse are available to them, but like you said John, it’s not a simple process. I also don’t expect the Nationals to publicly comment on the legal or financial ramifications, at least not any time soon.
Posted by Ben Badler | March 6, 2009 at 12:34 pm | ShortcutFirst, I did not cross any picket line. I was injured in spring trainning and, while not really knowing how things worked, trusted the people working on me. I was not healthy and pretty much had the option of working with the Replacement Team or getting released. I wound up getting reasonably healthy and started pitching really well when I was optioned to Mexico. I was just very unfortunate to get with a bad organization at a bad time. If you want to get on people, you should get on guys who had guaranteed jobs in AAA that wound up with careers in the Big leagues. But then again, when you are dealing with a Millionaire’s Union there really is no such thing as a picket Line. As for Pujols, if he really was 22 instead of 19 when he signed he would not of been given the same opportunities, plain and simple. Who knows, he might not of been signed, had to go to Indy ball or to a 4 year school and then who knows. Or he would have signed at 22 and been given limited opportunities because the 18 and 19 year olds would have been more a priority. It would be nice if MLB would get more baseball people to look for Baseball Players. Age is the ultimate excuse for all the bad non-baseball people in baseball. It lets you survive all your mistakes. Meanwhile, you miss alot of guys who can play. Steroids or any PED make you better or else the majority of players would not do it. Changing your age does not make you a better player. But it can get you a shot to prove if you can play. Obviously, I proved I could play. Should I have been penalized for being injured and working my *** off to have a career at a later stage than most players? Hell no. I just wanted to be judged on my performance and abilty.
Posted by Will Flynt | March 6, 2009 at 2:20 pm | ShortcutWill, I totally agree with you. Team executives loves about projecting players as if they where dreaming with Santa Claus. You can’t project the average Dominican player with the same path used with the average US-American born player. There are plenty factors the make both very different: feeding habits standards, education (how to handle money), culture and government protection. I guess Oakland will assume that Michael Inoa will gain 2 or 3 MPH every year until he get to his 20s… and there is a big margin for error in that assumption. If teams consider a 18 yr old latin player too old to be signed, why don’t you ask how many latin players have reached the majors younger than 25?
Posted by Alberto | March 13, 2009 at 2:26 pm | Shortcutin response to Larry Gilbaur: The whole ‘field of dreams’ approach is a nice idea at the little league level, but all the last 15 years or so has shown this falls apart when it comes to MLB. The game’s answer to labor laws was to exploit latin American youth, who could be potentially hustled and had for less overall financial investment. While US players are bound by the draft, helping ensure some degree of competitive fairness among the clubs, latin America is basically the ‘Wild West’ where money, guile, and power rule. So let’s see things as they are, ok? It’s exploitation as much as it was when in the 70s clubs knew they could sign/mine HS black players cheaper (substitute ‘poor’ for ‘black’ and it works as well).
So you blame the exploited population for adapting to the situation and maximizing their own benefits? Doesn’t hold water for me. Scouts reporting back to their clubs should simply include possible age variation in their assessments. Or, clubs should remember the influx of ‘seasoned’ black ballplayers once MLB owners decided to shirk the anti-black rules of the land because of the chance to make more money (i.e. beat the other clubs).
The game is bigger, eh? I’m sorry, but it’s an American game and American business is bigger than anything, or so it thinks.
Posted by Kenny | March 14, 2009 at 9:16 am | ShortcutI think it’s hard to argue against the fact that people have a physical peak. Every single player in baseball history has had a increase, peak, and decline. The length has varied, but generally this covers the same range. This is why a player that is awesome at 16 is far, far, more valuable than a player that is 20. The 16 year old will grow more than the 20 year. I don’t understand why, judging form the comments here, this is such a difficult concept to grasp.
I think the bigger question in all this is, what current big leaguers are older than they say? We already know Tejada and Vlad Guerrero lied about there ages. Andruw Jones was great at an unusually young age and fell apart at an unusually young age, so it’s not unreasonable to believe he lied about his age. Pujohls may just be a freak, but I hope he is being investigated. He does appear to be signifigantly older than he claims to be. How to be a big leaguer: At age twenty, hit like a great high schooler -> Lie about your age, get a big signing bonus -> uses this money to buy HGH and bribes -> be a big leaguer.
Posted by Bill | April 2, 2009 at 11:51 am | Shortcut