More Draft Details From The CBA



More details about draft changes resulting from baseball's new collective bargaining agreement continue to trickle out. Some highlights:

  • The draft has been reduced from 50 to 40 rounds.
  • The draft caps for all 30 teams for the first 10 rounds will total approximately $185 million in 2012, varying depending on the number of supplemental picks created by free-agent compensation and failure to sign 2011 draftees from the first three rounds. The competitive-balance lottery selections don't come into play until 2013.
  • Any attempt to circumvent the draft cap, such as an under-the-table agreement, is expressly prohibited.
  • The most significant new detail: If a team fails to sign a player in the first 10 rounds, its draft cap is reduced by the assigned value of his pick. It can't reallocate that value to sign other players. However, it can reallocate the difference between a player's bonus and the value of his choice.
  • If a player fails a physical and the team fails to offer him 40 percent of the assigned value of his pick, he becomes a free agent. In that case, the club's draft cap would be reduced by the value of his selection.
  • Not only has the signing deadline moved from Aug. 15 to mid-July, it will be at 5 p.m. rather than midnight ET. The 2012 deadline is July 13.
  • MLB has eliminated its draft-support program, which served as a clearinghouse for offers and was used to strong-arm teams into not disclosing over-slot deals until shortly before the deadline. This means clubs actually can announce signings as they happen rather than pretend that they haven't occurred.
  • Competitive-balance lottery picks (and only those picks) can be traded. They can only be dealt by the original team that held the choice, and they can't be exchanged for cash (unless it's cash to offset the salary of players included in the trade, subject to MLB approval). Lottery-pick deals can occur only during a regular season and not during an offseason.
  • Teams get an extra year of protection for compensation picks for failure to sign draftees from the first three rounds. For example, the Blue Jays get the 22nd pick in 2012 after not signing No. 21 overall choice Tyler Beede in 2011. If Toronto can't come to terms with the compensation selection, it would get another one in 2013.
  • Teams no longer are required to physically tender a contract to draftees within 15 days of the draft, eliminating the rule that infamously led to the four loophole free agents of 1996.
  • The logistics for a proposed predraft medical combine still are being worked out.


Comments

Comments will be monitored prior to being added to the site. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be rejected. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed.

We have chosen to open up commenting to everyone, so comment away! We want to hear from each and every one of you! Leave a comment.

11 Comments

"Competitive-balance lottery picks (and only those picks) can be traded. They can only be dealt by the original team that held the choice, and they can't be exchanged for cash (unless it's cash to offset the salary of players included in the trade, subject to MLB approval). Lottery-pick deals can occur only during a regular season and not during an offseason."

Am i interpreting this correctly? The top 15 picks in the draft can now be traded?

Walter: No. Only the newly created competitive-balance lottery picks, six in the supplemental first round and six in the supplemental second round, can be traded. Compensation picks for the loss of free agents or failure to sign previous draftees can’t be traded. The lottery picks won’t come into play until 2013.

Ah i see now, thanks for the clarification Jim. It will be interesting to see how frequently these picks are actually traded.

Jim-
 
do you see the bolded above really having much of an impact? Couldn't a team just take a roster-filler college senior type in rounds 5-10, give him a 10K bonus, and use the difference between the 10K and the pick's value to give to other players?

Dave: A team could, but whether all the teams that will want extra cap space will punt that many picks remains to be seen. But that’s not the reason I bolded that rule. It’s main significance is that a team can’t create millions of dollars in cap space by not signing an early pick, because you lose the cap space for anyone who doesn’t sign. There’s no easy loophole to create extra cap room.

If a team doesn't sign a pick in rounds 1-10 does it get the same pick the following year?

What about undrafted college and high school players? With 40 rounds instead of 50 there's 300 more than usual. Will they be capped as well?

Ric: No . . . that rule hasn’t changed. An unsigned pick in the first two rounds yields a compensation choice following the same pick in the next year’s draft. A unsigned third-rounder yields a compensation choice following the third round.

Gary: I’ve been told the $100,000 limit (anything over that counts against a team’s draft cap) after the 10th round also applies to nondrafted free agents. But so many players in the draft don’t sign (555 of 1,530 picks in 2011), reducing the draft by 40 rounds isn’t going to have any significant repercussions.

Jim-
The competitive balance lottery picks can be traded, but what about the draft cap penalizations picks which are reallocated in a lottery starting in 2013?  In other words, in the unlikely event that someone exceeds their draft budget by more than 5% and loses a 2013 first round pick, and that pick is now awarded in a lottery, wouold that pick tradeable as well? 

Jim … Perhaps it's simply too early on a Saturday morning … but is the $185mm per team or the total for all 30 teams?
Although there are exceptions, the rather draconian changes by Seligdorf to the draft appear to hurt the smaller market teams most.  The Rays, KC, Bucs, Nats (for instance) have been big players … drafting wisely and often allows them a "competitive edge" given their inability to compete with bigger markets for FAs. (Werth exception noted). It seems odd to me that MLB is being so punitive in "punishing" clubs with good scouting resources and the willingness to allocate dollars over slot for players both in the MLB and Intl Draft.
What appears to be the "unintended consequence" is ML teams being "forced" to overpay for mediocre (Capuano – $10/2yrs or "aging" talent Bell, age 34 – $27/3yrs). The other obvious consequence is losing prospects (Szczur, Harper, Maples) to college and/or other sports, reducing the pool of talent … both MLB and Intl.


What Are Your Thoughts?

• Line and paragraph breaks are automatic
• Your e-mail address will never be displayed











About This Blog

  • The Draft Blog is a source of frequent updates about the draft and the top prospects eligible for the draft. If you have questions or comments you can e-mail them to draftblog@baseballamerica.com.

Categories

Archives

Syndicate This Blog

Blogs

BaseballAmerica.com

Search This Blog