<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bonus Expenditures, 2007-11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/2011/08/bonus-expenditures-2007-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/2011/08/bonus-expenditures-2007-11/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:45:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lifestyles365</title>
		<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/2011/08/bonus-expenditures-2007-11/comment-page-1/#comment-56395</link>
		<dc:creator>Lifestyles365</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/?p=4080#comment-56395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First thing that comes to mind is: Pirates??&#160; Nationals is no surprise considering the Strasburg, Harper, and Storen bonuses.&#160; A little surprising is the Braves..3rd lowest yet one of the most productive systems.
	&#160;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First thing that comes to mind is: Pirates??&nbsp; Nationals is no surprise considering the Strasburg, Harper, and Storen bonuses.&nbsp; A little surprising is the Braves..3rd lowest yet one of the most productive systems.<br />
	&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>