Bud Selig doesn’t make the decision himself. But he said strongly Wednesday that when the next Collective Bargaining Agreement expires in 2011, he wants hard slots for the draft and an international draft to be part of the equation.
Speaking on ESPN Radio’s "Mike & Mike" show, co-hosted today by ESPN baseball writer Buster Olney, Selig answered a question about the international draft by saying he wants one, and threw in hard slotting—as opposed to the current system, where the commissioner’s office recommends slots but has no real enforcement mechanism—as part of the equation.
"That’s one that there’s no debate in my mind," Selig said. "We need an international draft, and we need slotting. There is no question about it. I’ve had many clubs on all sides, small-market, big-market, medium-market—we’re going to have slotting, and we’re going to have an international draft. Those will be two of our great priorities in 2011. There’s no question about it. We need that. That is one that really exacerbates the differences (between organizations)."
Selig answered a question likening a new baseball draft slotting system to the NBA’s rookie wage scale by adding, "That’s correct." That implies he’s for hard slots, where before the draft every club knows what its assigned signing bonus would be for every pick. Of course two major differences are the NBA slots only for the first round and has just two rounds of its draft, and NBA teams rosters half the size of baseball with nominal minor leagues in the NBA Developmental (or more commonly "D") League.
Still, Selig laid out his platform, consistent with other statements he’s made on the subject. It sounds like, for once, the scouting and player development side will be a prominent part of the CBA negotiations.
|
Comments will be monitored prior to being added to the site. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be rejected. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We have chosen to open up commenting to everyone, so comment away! We want to hear from each and every one of you! Leave a comment. |
About This Blog
Categories
Archives
Syndicate This Blog
Blogs
BaseballAmerica.com
Search This Blog
This shouldn’t be a hard sell to the MLBPA since the current system hurts veterans marketability with compensation picks for FA. Also, capping rookie signings would theoretically make more team funds available to FA & Arbitraton Eligible veterans and thus raising salaries (not a straight line equivilence, but one would expect it to be a contributing factor).
Posted by estuartj | October 9, 2009 at 1:32 pm | ShortcutSlotting exists where their are league salary caps and revenue sharing between clubs in place. If MLB is willing to tackle these issues, then slotting might work. It’s a piece of the puzzle, but won’t work well unless a comprehensive solution is reached.
Slotting alone will push more high school players to college if the compensation is artificially low, and shift the emphasis more to college as the developmental league than it already is. Also, you will see more juniors stay for their fourth year in college because they won’t necessarily be losing anything–it’s slotted–by staying an extra year and completing their degree.
Who will represent the high school players? Huge conflicts of interest exist with the MLBPA doing that, because they are there to maximize exisitng players’ revenue. Interstingly, in the NBA and NFL, the drafted players become part of the union. That does not happen in baseball, so who represents the high school players in this negotiation?
Posted by Billy | October 9, 2009 at 6:23 pm | ShortcutAn international draft, or a single draft of all players is probably a good idea. However, when it comes to hard slotting, Selig again shows that he does not understand the consequences of that decision or what is in the best interest of MLB. Top draft choices paid above slot have been proven on average to be a good deal for MLB over the long haul.
Hard slotting is a gift to College Baseball since it will deprive MLB teams of the ability to lure smart high school and college players before they graduate. Might as well forget scouting much high school talent. Saying that there is an MLB scholarship program is disingenuous since that program is notoriously not student friendly and it comes without the great academic support that colleges provide to their student athletes.
Posted by Phil | October 11, 2009 at 2:59 am | Shortcutdittos here I agree with phil. Bud stay out of the mlb draft. Players will be going to college, instead of signing professional contracts and developing there instead of in the minors .
Posted by daniel | October 13, 2009 at 2:45 pm | ShortcutDont most sports with hrd slotting have players that “declare” for the draft? I presume that if you declare, you would pre agree to a slotted price. It also seems that once you declare, you lose your college eligability. I dont know this, but I have heard it discussed.
Posted by A. Sale | October 27, 2009 at 12:46 pm | ShortcutBaseball must negotiate for Revenue Sharing and a salary cap. Without this all else is of not significance. As a fan of baseball I doubt if MLB has the intestinal fortitude to hold out for this. They will lose their fan base if they don’t get this in one form or another.
Posted by Bill Armstrong | January 3, 2010 at 10:32 pm | Shortcut