Here’s a look at how much each team spent on the top 10 rounds of the 2009 draft. Complete draft budgets will not be available for several more weeks.
(Updated following the Aaron Crow and Tanner Scheppers signings of Sept. 17)
| Team | No. of Picks | Picks Signed | Total |
| Nationals | 11 | 10 | $10,869,500 |
| Mariners | 12 | 12 | $10,636,600 |
| Tigers | 10 | 9 | $8,857,100 |
| Padres | 10 | 10 | $8,735,500 |
| Diamondbacks | 15 | 15 | $8,548,700 |
| Pirates | 11 | 11 | $8,081,900 |
| Rockies | 12 | 12 | $7,663,300 |
| Angels | 14 | 13 | $6,386,900 |
| Athletics | 9 | 8 | $6,035,900 |
| Brewers | 13 | 13 | $6,005,900 |
| Giants | 10 | 10 | $5,813,500 |
| Red Sox | 10 | 9 | $5,711,400 |
| Royals | 9 | 9 | $5,600,000 |
| Reds | 11 | 11 | $5,182,900 |
| Orioles | 10 | 9 | $5,147,200 |
| Yankees | 9 | 8 | $4,760,000 |
| Cardinals | 10 | 10 | $4,508,500 |
| Twins | 11 | 10 | $4,223,100 |
| White Sox | 12 | 10 | $3,892,100 |
| Indians | 10 | 10 | $3,853,000 |
| Dodgers | 11 | 11 | $3,714,600 |
| Braves | 9 | 8 | $3,714,500 |
| Blue Jays | 12 | 9 | $3,675,700 |
| Marlins | 10 | 10 | $3,544,800 |
| Astros | 11 | 11 | $3,426,800 |
| Rays | 10 | 7 | $3,285,000 |
| Cubs | 10 | 10 | $3,254,700 |
| Rangers | 11 | 7 | $3,161,700 |
| Phillies | 9 | 9 | $2,755,000 |
| Mets | 9 | 7 | $1,864,300 |
|
Comments will be monitored prior to being added to the site. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be rejected. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We have chosen to open up commenting to everyone, so comment away! We want to hear from each and every one of you! Leave a comment. |
About This Blog
Categories
Archives
Syndicate This Blog
Blogs
BaseballAmerica.com
Search This Blog
Wouldn’t it figure that the Mets went cheap?
Posted by Tony | August 18, 2009 at 2:00 pm | ShortcutThe Mets are a joke.. how can they deny the financial dire straits they’re in any longer?
Posted by Rick | August 18, 2009 at 2:03 pm | ShortcutWow!!! How could a team in the biggest market spend the least amount of money?
Looks like Madoff has bankrupt Freddie Coupons!
Posted by Kevin | August 18, 2009 at 2:08 pm | ShortcutSo if the Mets signed the same players, but gave each of them an extra million dollars, it would have been a great draft?
M’kay…….
Posted by Grapeweasel | August 18, 2009 at 2:28 pm | ShortcutBring back Tony Bernazard!!
Posted by John | August 18, 2009 at 2:34 pm | ShortcutThe Mets reluctance to pay overslot is well documented.
I just don’t understand how it’s possible (when looking at the state of their farm system) to lowball prospects.
Posted by Brendan | August 18, 2009 at 2:44 pm | ShortcutDodger= CHEAPEST TEAM IN THE MLB
Posted by Matthew | August 18, 2009 at 4:14 pm | ShortcutThe Mets intentionally avoided drafting high school players like Max Stasi, Zack Von Rosenberg, Brody Colvin and Luke Bailey. They knew who they were, and they knew they were not going to pay them.
And who was the last Scott Boras draftee of the Mets? Have they ever drafted a Boras client? Did they not pass on Rick Porcello and Matt Harvey?
Their farm looks like their spending position.
Posted by AEC | August 18, 2009 at 5:18 pm | ShortcutMike Pelfrey is a Boras client, drafted by the Mets.
Posted by JessD | August 18, 2009 at 11:13 pm | ShortcutSo given the amount spent by the Cardinals (middle of the pack)– did they get value for their ten picks?
Posted by Allen | August 19, 2009 at 6:29 pm | ShortcutSure it’s risky, but draft dollars are the best investment in baseball. If you didn’t spend much, then you didn’t do a good job of drafting.
Posted by Walt | August 20, 2009 at 12:34 pm | Shortcut[...] Cooper over at Baseball America has a list of the money spent on the top ten rounds of the 2009 draft. The Mets unsurprisingly spent the [...]
Posted by Building From the Ground Up. | Met Fan Left On Base | November 4, 2009 at 6:26 pm | Shortcut