The Nationals find themselves in a unique position. They’re the first club ever to have two of the first 10 picks in the same draft, the result of finishing with the worst record in baseball in 2008 (giving them the No. 1 overall choice) and also failing to sign No. 9 overall selection Aaron Crow (landing them the No. 10 pick as compensation).
When we posted our initial first-round projections
last week, we projected that Washington would spend what it takes to sign überprospect Stephen Strasburg with the top choice and then look to save money at No. 10. Our forecast was that the Nationals would take Kennesaw State righthander Chad Jenkins.
Afterward, acting Washington general manager Mike Rizzo contacted Baseball America to say that talent would be the only consideration for that latter pick, which won’t be protected by compensation a second time.
"We do not have to take a signability pick," Rizzo said. "We’re going to take the best guy. We’re going to have 10 names up there on the board, and we’ll take one we like."
Strasburg reportedly is seeking a $50 million major league contract and is expected to at least shatter Mark Prior’s record for guarantee money given to a draftee ($10.5 million from the Cubs in 2001). Last year’s No. 10 choice, Jason Castro, received a $2.07 million bonus from the Astros.
Rizzo did acknowledge that if the player the Nationals liked at No. 10 wasn’t considered a consensus top-10 talent, they could use that leverage to cut a deal below MLB’s bonus recommendation. But he reiterated that ability and not signability would drive the decision as to whom to select.
"We do see this draft as one where the guy we take with the No. 10 pick might be No. 25 on someone else’s board," Rizzo said. "But if we take, say, Chad Jenkins or [California outfielder] Brett Jackson or whoever, it’s because we think he’s the 10th-best guy in the draft."
|
Comments will be monitored prior to being added to the site. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be rejected. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We have chosen to open up commenting to everyone, so comment away! We want to hear from each and every one of you! Leave a comment. |
About This Blog
Categories
Archives
Syndicate This Blog
Blogs
BaseballAmerica.com
Search This Blog
As an Expos/Nationals fan for 20+ years, I hope the front office does indeed go for the best available draftee of need at the 1st and 10th pick. In order to fill the new Nationals stadium,they better start building with young exceptional talent. It also didn’t help that Omar Minaya gave away Lee, Phillips, and Sizemore then “jumped ship” to become GM of Mets.
Posted by Andrew | May 19, 2009 at 10:09 am | ShortcutI think the important thing is that they sign the player. I don’t care if its above, at or below slot signing him is all that matters. The last thing the Nats need is a Gerrit Cole type situation, so to me even though I love Tate i wouldn’t take him if he falls.
Posted by Steveo | May 19, 2009 at 12:12 pm | Shortcut[...] with their 2nd pick. After all, some are saying that it might take $50 M to sign Strasburg. Well according to Jim Callis at BA, that aint the case: Washington general manager Mike Rizzo contacted Baseball America to say that talent would be the [...]
Posted by Nats Plan to Draft for Realsies « The Nationals Review | May 20, 2009 at 8:03 am | Shortcut[...] on the subject of the Nats, Rizzo also says the Nats will not go cheap with their second pick, #10 overall. Slot money for the tenth overall pick is expected to be around $2.1M, which means the [...]
Posted by 2009 Draft: Notes & Thoughts | River Avenue Blues | May 20, 2009 at 10:30 am | ShortcutI could see the Nats taking either Shelby Miller or maybe even Tanner Scheppers with this pick, assuming this isn’t lip service.
Posted by Josh | May 20, 2009 at 11:07 pm | Shortcut