More significant changes to Major League Baseball’s performance-enhancing drug policy were announced today by MLB and the union, and for the most part they confirmed what numerous media outlets already have reported: the program will have an independent administrator, will conduct significantly more tests each year, and will issue an annual report on the results of the testing.
Of particular interest to Baseball America readers, however, is a new provision that says MLB’s testing program will expand to include the top 200 prospects in the draft each year. MLB will notify each club about which players test positive, though those players will remain eligible for the draft. Players who refuse to take the test, however, will not be eligible for the draft.
Employers obviously have the right to test prospective employees, but this provision creates more questions than answers at this point. Who will determine the top 200 prospects? (We recommend Baseball America’s list.) When will the test be administered? And what exactly happens to the players who become ineligible for the draft because they decline to be tested? Somewhere we know Scott Boras has lawyers working on that very question. We’ll do the same and report the details and implications as we get them.
|
Comments will be monitored prior to being added to the site. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be rejected. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We have chosen to open up commenting to everyone, so comment away! We want to hear from each and every one of you! Leave a comment. |
About This Blog
Categories
Archives
Syndicate This Blog
Blogs
BaseballAmerica.com
Search This Blog
How can these new rules be put into place less than 7 weeks before the draft? Were they already part of the CBA and had not been released by the media/BA, or are these amendments recently imposed?
And in that vein, when will MLB begin treating its draft with the detail and attention it should receive as opposed to a two-day garage sale that is more of a burden that its worth to them? The TV was great, but it seems like the logistics and provisions of the draft itself and the players subject to it are always that sticky note on the corner of the cork board that is never quite followed up on accountably.
This is the process by which how many major league players enter professional baseball? 60%? 70%? And now its significance has seemed to have became a bargaining chip for the union to make concessions on the drug policy to appease MLB.
Posted by Mike | April 15, 2008 at 10:43 pm | Shortcut