<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two More First-Rounders Sign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/2007/07/two-more-first-rounders-sign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/2007/07/two-more-first-rounders-sign/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:45:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: b</title>
		<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/2007/07/two-more-first-rounders-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/?p=179#comment-261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve heard that there&#039;s a bit of a backup at the commish&#039;s office on the paperwork for those who have gone over slot, so that might explain things as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard that there&#8217;s a bit of a backup at the commish&#8217;s office on the paperwork for those who have gone over slot, so that might explain things as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squire</title>
		<link>http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/2007/07/two-more-first-rounders-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Squire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/?p=179#comment-260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lowering the slots a full 10% in one year seems unjustified.  Neither MLB revenues nor inflaction was -10% last year.  The system is broken.  Essentially you&#039;ve got 4 teams (Yankees, Red Sox, Angels and Cubs) who have no problem just ignoring the slot recommendations.  If the system was unfair, now its MORE unfair.  Its time for the MLBPA to insist on collectively bargaining away the recommendations that only apply to the other 26 teams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lowering the slots a full 10% in one year seems unjustified.  Neither MLB revenues nor inflaction was -10% last year.  The system is broken.  Essentially you&#8217;ve got 4 teams (Yankees, Red Sox, Angels and Cubs) who have no problem just ignoring the slot recommendations.  If the system was unfair, now its MORE unfair.  Its time for the MLBPA to insist on collectively bargaining away the recommendations that only apply to the other 26 teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>