Something You Don’t See Every Day . . .



GREENVILLE, N.C.—Virginia is enjoying a comfortable 7-2 lead after three innings, but the margin could have been bigger if not for a botched call in the top of the third. The Cavaliers had runners on first and second with no outs, and Phil Gosselin hit a wind-blown pop-up halfway between home plate and first base. East Carolina first baseman John Wooten could not make the catch, and the ball landed a foot or two in fair territory, then kicked foul. The infield fly rule was invoked, and Gosselin was called out. UVa. coach Brian O'Connor came out to argue the call, to no avail, of course.

But here in the press box, we checked the rule book. Section 47 says, "If a declared infield fly becomes a foul ball, it is treated the same as any foul."

By my interpretation, that means the home-plate umpire missed the call—though it's not a play you see very often. ECU reliever Tyler Joyner retired the next hitter, Danny Hultzen, on a foul pop-up, then hit Dan Grovat to load the bases. But he wriggled out of the jam by getting Steven Proscia to fly out to center field.



Comments

Comments will be monitored prior to being added to the site. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be rejected. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed.

We have chosen to open up commenting to everyone, so comment away! We want to hear from each and every one of you! Leave a comment.

3 Comments

Now I did not have a good vantage point as I was standing in the Jungle(left field), but it looked to me like the ball hit the first baseman's glove in fair ground which would make the infield fly rule take effect. Wouldn't it? Now I was well over three hundred feet away, so my eyes would have not been the best in the world.

I suppose that depends on what your definitions of "fly" and "becomes" are. Does that mean the fly has to remain in the air — that is, go into foul ground on the fly — or does it allow for the situation you describe? I'm not sure I would label the call "botched." it certainly seems a reasonable interpretation to me that the ball would have to carry into foul ground on the fly to be treated as a foul ball. 

PCA, I considered your point, but after discussing it with others in the press box, the consensus was that the umpire missed the call — although I agree, it’s not entirely clear. Lewis, I wondered the same thing, but again, the press box consensus was that the ball was not touched in fair territory. So take that for what it’s worth.


What Are Your Thoughts?

• Line and paragraph breaks are automatic
• Your e-mail address will never be displayed











About This Blog

  • Aaron Fitt is the lead college writer for Baseball America. If you have questions or comments about college baseball you can e-mail him at collegeblog@baseballamerica.com.

Categories

Archives

Syndicate This Blog

Blogs

BaseballAmerica.com

Search This Blog