HOUSTON–Baylor just got hosed by the umpires about as bad as you can get hosed. With runners on first and second and one out in the top of the third, Dustin Dickerson hit a sinking liner to left field. Rice left fielder Jeremy Rathjen dove forward for it, and it’s unclear if he caught the ball or not, but the third base umpire standing right in front of the play in shallow left very clearly held his arms out to signal safe. Rathjen threw the ball in to second base, where the Owls should have gotten a force out, leaving runners on the corners with two outs.
Instead, the home-plate umpire appeared to overturn the call, ruling that the ball was caught and the runner on second base had been doubled off, ending the inning. Even if the ball was caught–and from my vantage point it’s tough to tell–there’s no way the home-plate umpire can make that call after the third-base umpire very clearly ruled the ball had dropped. The runners must take their cue from the third-base umpire and assume the ball dropped. This is not like yesterday’s triple play, where no umpire made any clear call and all the baserunners were confused. In this case, there was no ambiguity–one umpire made a call, and the other umpire took the game into his own hands, depriving Baylor of a key scoring opportunity in a game it trailed 3-1.
UPDATE: Here’s what Bears coach Steve Smith had to say about the controversial play:
"The umpire in the field ruled no catch–I believe everybody saw that. So the baserunners react to no catch. Rice threw the ball into second base–they’re reacting to the play the way they thought the play was. The umpire in the field asked for help, after he’s made a no-catch, and the umpire at home plate reversed the call. At that point in time, getting the call right is really a moot point. You can’t have a do-over on that kind of a play, and that’s what they did."
|
Comments will be monitored prior to being added to the site. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be rejected. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We have chosen to open up commenting to everyone, so comment away! We want to hear from each and every one of you! Leave a comment. |
About This Blog
Categories
Archives
Syndicate This Blog
Blogs
BaseballAmerica.com
Search This Blog
I was at the game, sitting right in the corner of the bottom of the stands in left field. There was clearly a catch from my view. The field umpire didn’t even see the play as he was turning. If that was the umpire I believe he was, he also blew several calls at first during the Rice/UCLA game on Friday.
Posted by formerlyanonymous | March 1, 2009 at 11:45 pm | ShortcutIt’s irrelevant whether or not it was a catch. When an umpire makes a call in that situation, it cannot be reversed—there cannot, as Coach Smith said, be a “do-over.”
Blown call. Whether caught or not, the call was blown, and Baylor got screwed.
Posted by BearFan | March 2, 2009 at 4:29 am | ShortcutIf, as Smith says, the baserunners reacted to no catch, why did the runner on first stay on first, instead of running to second to avoid the forceout?
Posted by Joe | March 2, 2009 at 10:05 am | ShortcutI, too, was at the game sitting down the left field line, but I thought Rathjen trapped the ball.
Regardless, the umpire clearly ruled “no catch” and so the runners have to take their cue from that. Why the field umpire would ask for help from a colleague about 40 yards farther away from the play than him is inexplicable.
Posted by KC | March 3, 2009 at 1:10 pm | Shortcut