The field of 64 has been announced, and there are just a few eyebrow-raisers. The Southeastern Conference, which has received no fewer than six bids every year since the NCAA tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1999, got just five teams in this year, as Tennessee and Alabama were left out. Both teams finished strong in the regular season, winning three of their final four conference series, but poor RPIs (Tennessee ranked 56th and Alabama 64th) combined with lackluster SEC tournament showings probably torpedoed both teams.
The Sun Belt Conference was the biggest beneficiary of the SEC’s down year, as Troy earned the Sun Belt’s third bid despite a mediocre RPI (54) and a 1-2 performance in the conference tournament, where the Trojans were the fourth seed. Troy has lost five of its last seven games and eight of its last 13. I’m baffled that the Trojans got the nod over a Tennessee team with a comparable RPI, a stronger stretch run (including an SEC tournament win over Vanderbilt) and a tougher conference schedule.
Memphis is in the same boat as Troy. The Tigers’ RPI is nothing special (50), they finished tied for fourth place in Conference USA, and they went 4-6 in their last 10 games. Memphis benefited in the RPI by playing six games against Rice in the last week, but the Tigers went just 1-5 in those games–they shouldn’t be rewarded for that. Memphis lost three of its final four conference series, including a home series against Marshall. Its best series win is a sweep of Southern Mississippi at the beginning of April, but the poor finish should have negated that.
Meanwhile, teams like Georgia Tech (29th in the RPI), College of Charleston (41st) and Gonzaga (75th) were left out. Georgia Tech’s poor finish (losing eight of its last 10) hurt, but that finish came in the ACC, which is a much tougher conference than the Sun Belt or CUSA. The Yellow Jackets have won series against North Carolina State and Rutgers, which should have trumped anything on Memphis’ resume. CofC has a stronger RPI and performed better in its conference than the Trojans or Tigers. And Gonzaga’s RPI is considerably lower, but its series wins against San Diego and Pepperdine are far more impressive than anything Memphis has done. Troy, at least, won a series from Coastal Carolina.
I was pleased to see Northern conferences like the Big East and Big Ten rewarded with three bids each. I didn’t think Minnesota would get in, but I thought it was deserving of a spot. And I applaud the committee for having the fortitude to flout history and award just five bids to the SEC. But if Tennessee and Alabama were going to be omitted, Troy and Memphis were the wrong teams to reward.
|
Comments will be monitored prior to being added to the site. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be rejected. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We have chosen to open up commenting to everyone, so comment away! We want to hear from each and every one of you! Leave a comment. |
About This Blog
Categories
Archives
Syndicate This Blog
Blogs
BaseballAmerica.com
Search This Blog
I can’t believe Coastal Carolina did not get a top 8 national seed.
Posted by Chris | May 28, 2007 at 1:41 pm | ShortcutI can’t believe C of C didn’t get in and WC did despite Charleston sweeping WC.
Posted by joe | May 28, 2007 at 2:24 pm | ShortcutThis bracket is a blatent attempt to pave the way for a southeastern team to win in Omaha. If you look at the BBA rankings, all of the top-16 ranked teams host one of the 16 regionals, except for two, #9 UC Irvine and #16 TCU.
So what did the selection committee do with these two top-16 teams without their own regionals? They could have sent these two top-16 teams across the country to where they could have been the #1 seed in one of the easy regionals. But NO, these two top-16 teams were paired against other top-16 teams in the first round.
And which regionals were chosen to unfairly match up two top-16 teams against each other? Texas and Rice, of course, Vanderbilt’s main threats.
Bottom line, the SEC-loaded NCAA selection committee has attempted to throw top-16 teams against Texas and Rice in an attempt to ease the way for either Vanderbilt or North Carolina to win in Omaha.
Posted by Becky | May 28, 2007 at 2:26 pm | ShortcutMan, the Rice regional is extremely tough in my opinion.
Posted by SJL | May 28, 2007 at 2:28 pm | ShortcutI can’t believe that Cal, which finished 4th in the Pac 10, didn’t get a bid. There have only been two teams in history that had a .500 or better record in the Pac 10 and did not get in . . . one was Cal in 2005 and now Cal in 2007. Two years ago, Cal finished 5th in the Pac 10 and the committe jumped over them to take Stanford, which finished 6th. This year it was Oregon State, which I know is the defending National Champ and won 38 games, but the finished 7th in the Pac 10!!!
This year, Cal took 2 of 3 off Arizona State, 2 of 3 off Irvine, swept Oral Roberts, swept USC, took a game off Oregon State at home and played several other top teams. It is too bad for the seniors on that team, who have now been passed over twice.
Posted by Dan | May 28, 2007 at 8:26 pm | Shortcut